Comparison

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Hyundai Ioniq9

quattro (19 inch wheels) vs Ioniq 9 RWD: range, price, charging, running costs and road-trip stops.

Best range Hyundai Ioniq9 335 mi vs 325 mi
Best value Hyundai Ioniq9 $58,955 vs $64,500
Faster charging Audi Q6 e-tron 21 min vs 24 min
5-yr energy Audi Q6 e-tron $5,050 vs $5,700

Winner by category

6 categories compared
Range winner
Hyundai Ioniq9
335 mi vs 325 mi
Value winner
Hyundai Ioniq9
$176/mi vs $198/mi
Charging winner
Audi Q6 e-tron
21 min vs 24 min
Efficiency winner
Audi Q6 e-tron
325 Wh/mi vs 370 Wh/mi
Utility/family winner
Hyundai Ioniq9
Ahead on seats, cargo, and tow capacity
Performance winner
Audi Q6 e-tron
4.9 s vs 8.4 s

Buying verdict

Editorial notes

The Q6 e-tron quattro is a five-seat SUV at $64,500 and 325 miles. The Ioniq 9 RWD seats more people at $58,955 and 335 miles.

Audi Q6 e-tron is best for

  • Couples or small families who need five seats and 325 miles.
  • Drivers who want the highest peak charge rate, 270 kW against 235 kW.
  • Buyers who want a 21-minute 10-80% stop, 3 minutes faster than the Ioniq 9.

Hyundai Ioniq9 is best for

  • Families who need a third row.
  • Buyers who want to spend $5,545 less, at $58,955.
  • Drivers who want 335 miles of range, 10 more than the Audi.

Start with seating: if five seats are enough, the Q6 charges faster, but the Ioniq 9 costs less and goes farther. The Ioniq 9 AWD trims use a NACS port, while the Q6 uses CCS1. Cargo figures (19 cu ft for the Q6, 22 for the Ioniq 9 RWD) favor the Hyundai too.

Side-by-side comparison

Featured trims
Side-by-side comparison of Audi Q6 e-tron and Hyundai Ioniq9
Spec Audi Q6 e-tron Hyundai Ioniq9
Trim used quattro (19 inch wheels) Ioniq 9 RWD
MSRP (USD) $64,500 $58,955 (better)
Range 325 mi 335 mi (better)
Efficiency 325 Wh/mi • 3.08 mi/kWh (better) 370 Wh/mi • 2.7 mi/kWh
Battery (usable) 94.9 kWh 107 kWh (better)
Seats 5 7 (better)
Drivetrain AWD RWD
Body type SUV SUV
DC max 270 kW (better) 235 kW
AC max 11 kW 11 kW
10–80% (DC) 21 min (better) 24 min
Roadtrip score 86.8 (better) 85.8
Miles added (15 min est.) 146 mi (better) 127 mi
USD per mile of range 198 $/mi 176 $/mi (better)
0–60 mph 4.9 s (better) 8.4 s
Cargo 19 cu ft 22 cu ft (better)

Pick the Audi Q6 e-tron if…

  • You want lower running costs: about $5,050 vs $5,700 in energy over 5 years.
  • You care about acceleration: 0-60 mph in 4.9 vs 8.4 seconds.

Pick the Hyundai Ioniq9 if…

  • You want the lower price: $58,955 vs $64,500 to start, $5,545 less.
  • You need 7 seats (vs 5).

5-year energy cost: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Hyundai Ioniq9

Charging mixAudi Q6 e-tronHyundai Ioniq9
Efficiency325 Wh/mi370 Wh/mi
All home charging$3,700$4,200
80% home, 20% public DC$5,050$5,700
All public DC fast charging$10,400$11,850

60,000 miles (12,000 a year) at rated efficiency, $0.17/kWh at home, $0.48/kWh at public fast chargers, plus 10% charging loss. A 30 mpg gas car at $3.20/gal would spend about $6,400 on fuel over the same miles. Use your own rates.

500-mile road trip: charging stops

Audi Q6 e-tronHyundai Ioniq9
First leg (90% to 10%)221 mi228 mi
Each leg after a 10-80% stop193 mi199 mi
Fast-charge stops22
Time spent chargingabout 40 minabout 50 min
DC portCCS1CCS1

Highway range taken as 85% of rated range. Each stop is counted as a full 10-80% session at the listed time, so the last stop is often shorter in practice. Cold weather and high speeds add stops. Charging time calculator.

Related comparisons

All comparisons