Comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Toyota C-HR
250 Plus vs SE: range, price, charging, running costs and road-trip stops.
Best range Toyota C-HR 287 mi vs 251 mi
Best value Toyota C-HR $37,080 vs $53,900
Faster charging Toyota C-HR 30 min vs 32 min
5-yr energy Toyota C-HR $4,850 vs $4,500
Winner by category
6 categories comparedRange winner
Toyota C-HR
287 mi vs 251 mi
Value winner
Toyota C-HR
$129/mi vs $215/mi
Charging winner
Toyota C-HR
30 min vs 32 min
Efficiency winner
Toyota C-HR
290 Wh/mi vs 315 Wh/mi
Utility/family winner
Mercedes-Benz EQB
Ahead on seats, cargo, and tow capacity
Performance winner
Toyota C-HR
4.9 s vs 8.6 s
Side-by-side comparison
Featured trims| Spec | Mercedes-Benz EQB | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Trim used | 250 Plus | SE |
| MSRP (USD) | $53,900 | $37,080 (better) |
| Range | 251 mi | 287 mi (better) |
| Efficiency | 315 Wh/mi • 3.17 mi/kWh | 290 Wh/mi • 3.45 mi/kWh (better) |
| Battery (usable) | 66.5 kWh | 74.7 kWh (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Body type | SUV | SUV |
| DC max | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| AC max | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| 10–80% (DC) | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| Roadtrip score | 61.3 | 73.6 (better) |
| Miles added (15 min est.) | 69 mi | 90 mi (better) |
| USD per mile of range | 215 $/mi | 129 $/mi (better) |
| 0–60 mph | 8.6 s | 4.9 s (better) |
| Cargo | 17 cu ft | 25.3 cu ft (better) |
Pick the Mercedes-Benz EQB if…
- None of the specs we track favor it by a meaningful margin. Choose it for price offers, dealer access, or features outside this table.
Pick the Toyota C-HR if…
- You want the lower price: $37,080 vs $53,900 to start, $16,820 less.
- You drive long days: 287 vs 251 miles of rated range.
- You want lower running costs: about $4,500 vs $4,850 in energy over 5 years.
- You haul gear: 25.3 vs 17 cu ft of listed cargo space.
- You care about acceleration: 0-60 mph in 4.9 vs 8.6 seconds.
- You want to use Tesla Superchargers without an adapter: it has a native NACS port.
Availability: Mercedes-Benz EQB production has ended, so you'd be buying leftover or used stock.
5-year energy cost: Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Toyota C-HR
| Charging mix | Mercedes-Benz EQB | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | 315 Wh/mi | 290 Wh/mi |
| All home charging | $3,550 | $3,300 |
| 80% home, 20% public DC | $4,850 | $4,500 |
| All public DC fast charging | $10,100 | $9,300 |
60,000 miles (12,000 a year) at rated efficiency, $0.17/kWh at home, $0.48/kWh at public fast chargers, plus 10% charging loss. A 30 mpg gas car at $3.20/gal would spend about $6,400 on fuel over the same miles. Use your own rates.
500-mile road trip: charging stops
| Mercedes-Benz EQB | Toyota C-HR | |
|---|---|---|
| First leg (90% to 10%) | 171 mi | 195 mi |
| Each leg after a 10-80% stop | 149 mi | 171 mi |
| Fast-charge stops | 3 | 2 |
| Time spent charging | about 95 min | about 60 min |
| DC port | CCS1 | NACS |
Highway range taken as 85% of rated range. Each stop is counted as a full 10-80% session at the listed time, so the last stop is often shorter in practice. Cold weather and high speeds add stops. Charging time calculator.
Related comparisons
All comparisons Lexus RZ Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Lexus RZ • Toyota C-HR vs Lexus RZ ›
Toyota bZ4X Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Toyota bZ4X • Toyota C-HR vs Toyota bZ4X ›
Nissan Ariya Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Nissan Ariya • Toyota C-HR vs Nissan Ariya ›
Audi Q4 e-tron Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Audi Q4 e-tron • Toyota C-HR vs Audi Q4 e-tron ›
Subaru Solterra Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Subaru Solterra • Toyota C-HR vs Subaru Solterra ›
Subaru Trailseeker Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Subaru Trailseeker • Toyota C-HR vs Subaru Trailseeker ›
Honda Prologue Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Honda Prologue • Toyota C-HR vs Honda Prologue ›
Subaru Uncharted Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Subaru Uncharted • Toyota C-HR vs Subaru Uncharted ›